x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Graphical Abstracts
- Adler, Douglas GRemove Adler, Douglas G filter
- 2022 - 2023Remove 2022 - 2023 filter
Author
- Facciorusso, Antonio3
- Ramai, Daryl3
- Chandan, Saurabh2
- Mohan, Babu P2
- Mozell, Daniel2
- Ofosu, Andrew2
- Anderloni, Andrea1
- Asokkumar, Ravishankar1
- Barakat, Monique T1
- Daugherty, Evan1
- Deliwala, Smit S1
- Enofe, Ikponmwosa1
- Gkolfakis, Paraskevas1
- Juakiem, Wassem1
- Kassab, Lena L1
- Kennington, Daxton1
- Khan, Shahab R1
- Maida, Marcello1
- Ponnada, Suresh1
- Previtera, Melissa1
Keyword
- CI2
- confidence interval2
- FDA2
- Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience2
- MAUDE2
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration2
- aADR1
- adenoma detection rate1
- ADR1
- advanced adenoma detection rate1
- colorectal cancer1
- colorectal cancer detection rate1
- CRC1
- CRCDR1
- fecal immunochemical test1
- FIT1
- ICU1
- intensive care unit1
- malignant gastric outlet obstruction1
- MGOO1
- odds ratio1
- OR1
- PDR1
- polyp detection rate1
- WON1
Graphical Abstracts
4 Results
- Systematic review and meta-analysis
Early (<4 weeks) versus standard (≥4 weeks) endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 97Issue 3p415–421.e5Published online: November 14, 2022- Daryl Ramai
- Ikponmwosa Enofe
- Smit S. Deliwala
- Daniel Mozell
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 3Previous studies have demonstrated that the ideal time for drainage of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections is 4 to 6 weeks after their development. However, some pancreatic collections, notably infected pancreatic fluid collections, require earlier drainage. Nevertheless, the optimal timing of the first intervention is unclear, and consensus data are sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections <4 weeks after development compared with ≥4 weeks after development. - Original article Clinical endoscopy
Patient-related adverse events and device failures associated with commercially available enteral or duodenal self-expanding metal stents: an analysis of the MAUDE database
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 97Issue 2p309–313Published online: October 7, 2022- Daxton Kennington
- Daryl Ramai
- Douglas G. Adler
Cited in Scopus: 0Duodenal stents are widely used to treat patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO), most commonly from pancreatic cancer. The WallFlex (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass, USA) and Evolution (Cook Endoscopy, Winston-Salem, NC, USA) duodenal stents are in widespread use for treating MGOO. The objective of this study was to analyze device failures and patient-related adverse events reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for these 2 stents. - Systematic review and meta-analysis
Pooled rates of adenoma detection by colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk individuals with positive fecal immunochemical test: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 96Issue 2p208–222.e14Published online: April 9, 2022- Babu P. Mohan
- Shahab R. Khan
- Evan Daugherty
- Saurabh Chandan
- Suresh Ponnada
- Antonio Facciorusso
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 0Current adenoma detection rate (ADR) benchmarks for colonoscopy in individuals positive for a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) are ≥45% in men and ≥35% in women. These are based on weak, low-quality evidence. We performed a meta-analysis to ascertain the pooled ADR in FIT-positive colonoscopy. - Original article Clinical endoscopy
Analysis of reported adverse events related to single-use duodenoscopes and duodenoscopes with detachable endcaps
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 96Issue 1p67–72Published online: February 17, 2022- Andrew Ofosu
- Daryl Ramai
- Daniel Mozell
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Wassem Juakiem
- Douglas G. Adler
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 1Single-use duodenoscopes and duodenoscopes with detachable/disposable caps emerged in the market to mitigate the risk of ERCP-related infections. We aimed to investigate adverse events associated with these devices occurring after U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval.