x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Graphical Abstracts
- odds ratioRemove odds ratio filter
- 2022 - 2023Remove 2022 - 2023 filter
Author
- Abe, Hirofumi1
- Adler, Douglas G1
- Albéniz, Eduardo1
- Anderloni, Andrea1
- Antwi, Samuel O1
- Aoki, Tomonori1
- Aoyama, Taiki1
- Bi, Yan1
- Bourke, Michael J1
- Carrillo, Daniel Mitchell Castillo1
- Chandan, Saurabh1
- Chebaa, Benjamin R1
- Contreras, Luís Fernando García1
- Cortés, Pedro1
- Deliwala, Smit S1
- Dunbar, Kerry B1
- Enofe, Ikponmwosa1
- Facciorusso, Antonio1
- Feagins, Linda A1
- Forbes, Nauzer1
- Frehlich, Levi1
- Fujii, Hiroyuki1
- Fujimori, Shunji1
- Fujita, Minoru1
- Fukuda, Hisashi1
Graphical Abstracts
7 Results
- Systematic review and meta-analysis
Early (<4 weeks) versus standard (≥4 weeks) endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 97Issue 3p415–421.e5Published online: November 14, 2022- Daryl Ramai
- Ikponmwosa Enofe
- Smit S. Deliwala
- Daniel Mozell
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 3Previous studies have demonstrated that the ideal time for drainage of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections is 4 to 6 weeks after their development. However, some pancreatic collections, notably infected pancreatic fluid collections, require earlier drainage. Nevertheless, the optimal timing of the first intervention is unclear, and consensus data are sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections <4 weeks after development compared with ≥4 weeks after development. - Original article Clinical endoscopy
Impact of peroral endoscopic myotomy on high-resolution manometry findings and their association with the procedure’s outcomes
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 97Issue 4p673–683.e2Published online: October 31, 2022- Yoshitaka Hata
- Hiroki Sato
- Yuto Shimamura
- Hirofumi Abe
- Akio Shiwaku
- Junya Shiota
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 0Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is conducted for patients with esophageal motility disorders based on high-resolution manometry (HRM) findings. However, the impact of POEM on HRM findings and the associations between post-POEM HRM and outcomes have not been clarified. - Original article Clinical endoscopyOpen Access
Timing of colonoscopy in acute lower GI bleeding: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 97Issue 1p89–99.e10Published online: August 2, 2022- Yasutoshi Shiratori
- Naoki Ishii
- Tomonori Aoki
- Katsumasa Kobayashi
- Atsushi Yamauchi
- Atsuo Yamada
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 1We aimed to determine the optimal timing of colonoscopy and factors that benefit patients who undergo early colonoscopy for acute lower GI bleeding. - Original article Clinical endoscopy
Simple risk score to predict the likelihood of a positive EUS in idiopathic acute pancreatitis
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 96Issue 6p993–1001.e5Published online: July 15, 2022- Pedro Cortés
- Vivek Kumbhari
- Samuel O. Antwi
- Michael B. Wallace
- Massimo Raimondo
- Baoan Ji
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 0We sought to derive a risk score, DORM65, of known variables to predict the likelihood of a positive EUS in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP). - Original article Clinical endoscopy
Comparison of no stent fixation, endoscopic suturing, and a novel over-the-scope clip for stent fixation in preventing migration of fully covered self-expanding metal stents: a retrospective comparative study (with video)
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 96Issue 5p771–779Published online: June 10, 2022- Kenneth H. Park
- Daniel Lew
- Jamil Samaan
- Sarvanand Patel
- Quin Liu
- Srinivas Gaddam
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 1Endoscopic suturing and over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) are used to prevent migration of fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs). Recently, a dedicated OTSC was developed for securing FCSEMSs. Our primary aim was to compare the frequency of stent migration without stent fixation versus fixation with suturing or OTSCs, and out secondary aims were to compare clinical success, procedure duration, and adverse events. - Systematic review and meta-analysis
Clip closure to prevent adverse events after EMR of proximal large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 96Issue 5p721–731.e2Published online: June 3, 2022- Nauzer Forbes
- Sunil Gupta
- Levi Frehlich
- Zhao Wu Meng
- Yibing Ruan
- Sheyla Montori
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 4After EMR, prophylactic clipping is often performed to prevent clinically significant post-EMR bleeding (CSPEB) and other adverse events (AEs). Prior evidence syntheses have lacked sufficient power to assess clipping in relevant subgroups or in nonbleeding AEs. We performed a meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) from randomized trials assessing the efficacy of clipping to prevent AEs after EMR of proximal large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) ≥20 mm. - Original article Clinical endoscopy
Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy outcomes after 4 years of follow-up in a large cohort of patients with refractory gastroparesis (with video)
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 96Issue 3p487–499Published online: April 1, 2022- Oscar Víctor Hernández Mondragón
- Luís Fernando García Contreras
- Gerardo Blanco Velasco
- Omar Michel Solórzano Pineda
- Daniel Mitchell Castillo Carrillo
- Enrique Murcio Perez
Cited in Scopus: 4Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is used for refractory gastroparesis (RG) with good early-term but variable mid- and long-term outcomes. Limited data exist about candidates and long-term clinical and predictive factors. Our aim was to evaluate the 4-year follow-up efficacy and predictive factors in patients with RG.